As the election season heats up, both Kamala Harris for the Democrats and Donald Trump for the Republicans are sending their running mates into Pennsylvania to try to secure the crucial 19 electoral votes. Ohio Senator J.D. Vance and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz have both been making appearances in different parts of the state, with Vance in Pittsburgh, a Democratic stronghold, and Walz in rural Lawrence County. Despite the efforts, it remains to be seen whether they can successfully attract voters from the opposing party.
Vance’s rally in Pittsburgh saw him making a direct appeal to the city’s labor roots, positioning the Republican party as a better alternative for union workers who feel left behind by the Democrats. The narrative of job losses due to permitting restrictions has also resonated with some voters, leading them to consider voting Republican for the first time. Vance’s appeal extends beyond just economic issues, with attendees praising his communication skills and ability to connect with different segments of the population.
Vance’s humble origins and military service have also endeared him to voters in the region, with many finding his background relatable and authentic. His upbringing in Rust Belt Ohio and rural Kentucky is seen as an advantage in connecting with voters in similar areas surrounding Pittsburgh. Vance’s more measured approach to politics, especially compared to Trump’s brash style, has also helped him gain support among conservative voters who may have been turned off by the president.
On the other side, Tim Walz has been making inroads into rural areas that were strongholds for Trump in 2016. By emphasizing his values and upbringing in rural Nebraska, Walz is hoping to win over voters who may not like Trump but are unsure about Harris. Some former Republican voters have found a home in the Democratic Party, attracted by its inclusive approach, although changing party loyalty can be a challenge after years of identification with a particular party.
Both candidates are also making efforts to appeal to specific groups of voters, such as farmers, who play a crucial role in Pennsylvania politics. Walz’s understanding of the challenges faced by farmers due to corporate consolidation in the food sector has won him support from some in the farming community. Even those who may have voted for Trump in the past are considering alternatives based on issues that directly impact them, such as economic policies and trade wars. Despite the challenges of changing longstanding voting patterns, the candidates are hoping to make a dent in these key demographics in the final push towards Election Day.
