President Biden’s age has been a topic of discussion in terms of optics and energy. Many Americans, including those polled, feel that his age is less than ideal and wish that he were younger. However, the focus on his age fails to acknowledge that the presidency is not a solo mission. The team a president assembles plays a crucial role in governing, and Biden’s intelligence and judgment are more important than his age. The president is only as good as the advisers around him, and his selection of his cabinet reflects his presidential judgment, not just his stamina.
While Biden may be older than Trump, he is saner and more principled. The contrast between the two men is much more important than their age difference. There are voters who indicate that Biden’s age may push them towards Trump, but this dynamic defies common sense. Those who may prefer a more energetic version of Biden would likely still share values and policy leanings that make Trump a poor choice. The focus should be on the substance and values of the candidates, rather than their age or energy levels.
Biden’s age should not be the sole factor in determining his suitability for office. The team he selects and the values he upholds are much more important. The contrast between Biden and Trump in terms of principles and values is significant, and voters should not dismiss these qualities in favor of age or energy levels. The decisions that a president makes and the policies that are implemented are a result of the team that surrounds him, not just his individual capabilities.
In a world filled with falsehoods, it is important to be honest about the reasons for supporting a particular candidate. Those who indicate that Biden’s age may push them towards Trump likely have other reasons for their support, such as policy leanings or values. It is crucial to acknowledge the substance of a candidate’s platform and their values, rather than focusing solely on superficial qualities like age or energy levels. Voters should be honest about their reasons for supporting a particular candidate.
During a trip to New Zealand, the author observed a deep respect for nature and stewardship of the environment that put American behavior to shame. New Zealanders have a special appreciation for the majesty and fragility of their environment, leading to efforts to preserve and protect it. The government’s strict limits on activity in places like Doubtful Sound, reforestation efforts, and meticulous trapping of non-indigenous species demonstrate a commitment to preserving the natural beauty of the country. This commitment serves as a powerful inspiration for the importance of individual and communal actions in preserving the environment.
The author’s experience in New Zealand highlighted the importance of individual and collective actions in preserving the environment. Efforts to protect the natural beauty of the country, such as reforestation and trapping of non-indigenous species, serve as a model for stewardship of the environment. The commitment of New Zealanders to preserving their natural resources is an inspiration for the moral necessity of protecting and preserving the environment for future generations. Individual actions, such as picking up a stray beer can, contribute to the larger goal of maintaining the majesty of nature for future enjoyment.
