The article discusses the recent profile of a man named Huberman who juggles relationships with six different women, prompting a debate about the ethics of polyamory. The critique of Huberman isn’t just about his multiple partners, but rather his deceptive and selfish behavior in these relationships. The idea of sex-as-process is emphasized as a way to create a post-Hefnerian sexual culture that is more ethical and responsible. Polyamory is presented as a way to promote transparency and negotiation in relationships, offering an alternative to dangerous and deceptive forms of promiscuity.
However, the effectiveness of this model is questioned when looking at real-life examples. Huberman’s expertise in therapy-speak raises doubts about whether predators and cads can manipulate this system. Similarly, the memoir of a new mother in an open marriage doesn’t paint a rosy picture of the benefits of polyamory. The idea of establishing “safe” forms of liberation is further challenged by a controversial essay by transgender cultural critic Andrea Long Chu, advocating for interventions like puberty blockers and mastectomies for kids experiencing gender dysphoria, regardless of medical or psychological claims.
Overall, the article highlights the complexities and challenges of navigating modern relationships in the context of evolving sexual norms. The tension between freedom, ethics, and responsibility in polyamorous relationships is a central theme, as society grapples with how to create healthy and equitable sexual cultures. While polyamory is seen as a way to promote communication and transparency, questions remain about whether it truly fosters authentic connections and emotional fulfillment. The discussions around polyamory, gender dysphoria interventions, and sexual liberation reflect the ongoing debates about consent, power dynamics, and individual autonomy in intimate relationships.
