OneTaste, founded in 2005 by Nicole Daedone, is a company that offered orgasmic meditation classes as a way to improve women’s well-being and sexual expression. The classes involved 15-minute partnered practices that aimed to create a safe environment for women to explore their desires. In 2017, Daedone sold the company, which is now known as the Institute of OM. However, in 2023, she was charged with one count of forced labor conspiracy in connection to her leadership of OneTaste.
According to prosecutors, Daedone allegedly preyed on victims of trauma, forced them into debt by opening lines of credit to pay for courses at the company, had them sleep in communal homes, and manipulated them into performing sex acts with investors and clients. These allegations came to light a year after the release of the Netflix documentary “Orgasm Inc.,” which featured former employees who claimed they were subjected to a toxic environment while part of the OneTaste program. Despite these allegations, Daedone maintains that the practices at OneTaste were rooted in consent.
Daedone’s response to the allegations was to dismiss them as a “cut and paste” representation of the truth. She claimed that at OneTaste, they were always rooted in consent, and individuals were given the choice to participate or not. She maintained that throughout the practice, individuals were continually reminded that they could say yes or no, and that saying no was always a valid option. This assertion contrasts with the allegations made by prosecutors and former employees, who claim that participants were manipulated and coerced into performing sexual acts.
While Daedone’s perspective on the practices at OneTaste may differ from the allegations made against her, the fact remains that she is facing charges of forced labor conspiracy. The case highlights the complexities and ethical considerations surrounding practices that aim to improve women’s well-being and sexual expression. It also raises questions about the boundaries of consent and the responsibilities of those in positions of power within such organizations. As the legal proceedings unfold, the true nature of the practices at OneTaste and the extent of Daedone’s involvement in any illegal activities will become clearer.
The controversy surrounding Daedone and OneTaste serves as a cautionary reminder of the importance of upholding ethical standards and ensuring the safety and well-being of participants in wellness programs. It also underscores the need for transparency, accountability, and clear boundaries in such organizations. As the case unfolds, it will be important to scrutinize the practices and policies of companies like OneTaste to prevent potential harm and exploitation of vulnerable individuals. Ultimately, the outcome of this case will influence the future of similar organizations and the regulations governing their operations.
