The Harris campaign has shown support for ending cash bail and bail reform, emphasizing the need for a criminal justice system that serves all Americans regardless of economic status, gender, or race. Harris believes that public safety, not wealth, should determine who stays behind bars following an arrest. While her position on cash bail has varied throughout her public career as a district attorney, attorney general, and U.S. senator, Harris has previously called for an end to money bail due to its unjust and disproportionate harm on low-income communities and communities of color. However, she also made statements in the past advocating for more expensive bail to deter criminals from coming to San Francisco.
Critics of Harris have accused her of changing her positions on controversial policies for political gain. She has been criticized for her role in championing California’s crime law and accused of prioritizing her future political aspirations over taking a principled stance. Critics argue that Harris lacks consistency and may make decisions based on their impact on her career rather than genuine beliefs or values. The Trump campaign has characterized the elimination of cash bail as a “catastrophe” for public safety, claiming that it puts more violent criminals back on the streets and leads to increased crime rates. They specifically targeted Harris as a “dangerously liberal hypocrite” whose policies have contributed to rising crime rates in cities and states.
Abolishing cash bail is generally viewed as a progressive approach to criminal justice reform. However, data from states like New York shows that bail elimination can lead to higher recidivism rates. Researchers have found that the elimination of money bail has increased recidivism rates for individuals charged with nonviolent felonies, recent criminal history, and recent violent felony arrest. On the other hand, it has decreased recidivism rates for individuals charged with misdemeanors and those with no recent criminal history. This indicates that while bail reform may have benefits, it also has drawbacks and consequences that need to be carefully considered.
During her time as attorney general, Harris’ office argued against the release of nonviolent criminals because they provided cheap labor, highlighting the complexities and conflicting priorities within the criminal justice system. Harris has been criticized for her past policy decisions and positions on crime and law enforcement, with detractors claiming she has failed to take a consistent stance on important issues. Some have accused Harris of prioritizing political expediency over genuine principles, leading to criticism and backlash from those who feel she has failed to stand up for what is right. Harris faces scrutiny over her past roles in the criminal justice system, including controversial policies she advocated for or implemented.
Despite the criticism and scrutiny, the Harris campaign remains committed to ending cash bail and pursuing bail reform as a means of promoting a more equitable and just criminal justice system. Harris believes that all individuals, regardless of their economic status or background, should be treated fairly and have access to a system that prioritizes public safety and community well-being. While her past positions on cash bail have been inconsistent and have drawn criticism, Harris continues to advocate for reform and changes within the criminal justice system to address issues of inequality, discrimination, and harm that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Harris’ stance on cash bail and bail reform represents a key part of her vision for a fairer and more just society that values the dignity and rights of all its citizens.
