House Speaker Mike Johnson’s plan to attach a controversial bill to bar noncitizens from voting in US elections to a six-month government funding resolution is facing opposition from several House Republicans. At least six GOP representatives, including Greg Steube, Cory Mills, Jim Banks, Tim Burchett, Thomas Massie, and Matt Rosendale, have come out against the plan. They argue that they are not in favor of extending bloated spending and increasing the national debt further, making it difficult for Johnson to pass the proposal given the narrow margin in the House and lack of support from Democrats.
In response to the opposition, Johnson has appeared less confident in the prospects of his plan passing. Despite initially expressing certainty in the righteousness of his fight to bar noncitizens from voting, Johnson has acknowledged that the plan may face challenges in the upcoming vote. However, he remains steadfast in his commitment to this proposal and has made it clear to his leadership team that there is no alternative plan. This unwavering stance has further divided House Republicans, with some supporting Johnson’s plan while others believe he may have to abandon it and opt for a clean extension of government funding.
Republicans who support Johnson’s plan argue that lawmakers should be on the record explaining why they are opposed to the bill that would bar noncitizens from voting in US elections, even though it is already illegal for non-citizens to vote. While some House Democrats have previously voted for this controversial bill, it remains uncertain how the caucus will approach the vote this week. Additionally, GOP representatives who are undecided on how to vote are seeking clarity from Johnson on his commitment to including the SAVE Act in the deal, questioning the necessity of their support without a clear plan from the speaker.
Despite the challenges and opposition faced by Johnson’s plan, the ultimate decision on the government funding resolution will rely on the votes of House Republicans. Some party members, like Mike Garcia, anticipate that Johnson may have to abandon his initial proposal and pass a clean extension of government funding, as previous Congresses have done to avert shutdowns. As the vote approaches, House Republicans are uncertain about whether they will ultimately stick together and pass their version of the funding package. The outcome of the vote will determine the future of government funding and potential implications for noncitizen voting in US elections.
