The Republican candidate for Michigan’s 3rd Congressional District, Paul Hudson, has come under scrutiny for defending a Chinese-owned firm, Yubei (Xinxiang) Power Steering, in a 2015 lawsuit. The firm is a subsidiary of the Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), a defense contractor owned by the Chinese Communist Party which has faced multiple espionage investigations. One such investigation revealed that F-35 technology data was allegedly passed to AVIC by a secretive Chinese military unit and later appeared in China’s J-20 stealth fighter jet. This case has raised concerns about Hudson’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
In response to the allegations, a spokesperson for Hudson’s campaign stated that the candidate has represented a wide variety of clients over the years and the case in question involved a contract dispute that was quickly dismissed. However, Hudson’s association with a Chinese-owned firm involved in espionage could impact his candidacy in Michigan, where a dispute between a small town and a Chinese company over plans to build an electric vehicle battery plant near a military base generated national headlines. Hudson’s opponent in the GOP primary, Michael Markey, has criticized him for his ties to the Chinese Communist Party, citing national security concerns.
Markey argued that Hudson’s defense of the Chinese Communist Party is troubling, as the party has been known to disrupt American interests. He accused Hudson of being a “lawyer for sale to the highest bidder” and expressed concerns about Hudson prioritizing personal interests over those of voters. The incumbent, Rep. Hilary Scholten, did not respond to a request for comment on the matter. Hudson’s campaign spokesperson highlighted his history of opposing Chinese aggression and influence, emphasizing his support for efforts to counter China’s influence operations in the United States.
Hudson’s ties to a Chinese-owned firm involved in espionage have raised questions about his suitability for public office, particularly in a swing state like Michigan. Concerns over foreign influence and national security have come to the forefront in light of the Gotion Inc. lawsuit, which highlighted the Chinese company’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Markey criticized Hudson for defending the Chinese Communist Party and accused him of putting personal financial interests ahead of the safety and well-being of Michigan residents.
As Michigan prepares for its congressional primary elections, voters will have to weigh the candidates’ positions on China and national security. Hudson’s defense of a Chinese-owned firm linked to espionage investigations has put him at odds with his opponent and raised questions about his ability to represent the interests of Michigan residents. The outcome of the primary will have implications for the state’s stance on Chinese influence and the ongoing efforts to counter foreign interference in American affairs. Voters will have to decide whether Hudson’s past actions align with their priorities and values.
