Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic <\/p>\n
\t\tGambling content 21+. The New York Post may receive an affiliate commission if you sign up through our links. Read our editorial standards for more information.<\/p>\n
A month ago, it looked like Carlos Alcaraz had the yips.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The Spaniard had just lost to David Goffin at the Miami Masters, his second defeat in as many matches after he fell to Jack Draper in the Indian Wells semifinals.\u00a0<\/p>\n
It was a stretch to say Alcaraz, who won 13 of his first 15 matches in 2025, was struggling, but he\u2019s such a talent that any blip in form will get tongues wagging.<\/p>\n
Alcaraz can silence the critics with a win over Lorenzo Musetti in Sunday\u2019s final at the Monte Carlo Masters.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Alcaraz is a -400 favorite to lift the trophy.<\/p>\n
Use BetMGM bonus code POSTBET to get your first bet back in bonus bets if your first bet doesn\u2019t win, up to $1,500.<\/p>\n
Alcaraz vs. Musetti betting preview<\/p>\n
Alcaraz\u2019s return to form is certainly the big story ahead of Sunday\u2019s final, but it\u2019s his opponent that has had the more noteworthy run to the final.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s been a relatively slow start to the season for Musetti. The Italian was ousted in Round 3 of the Australian Open and then barely played during the Golden Swing because of injury. He didn\u2019t make any noise at Indian Wells or Miami, either.<\/p>\n
However, Musetti has found his form in Monte Carlo.<\/p>\n
The World No. 16 defeated Jiri Lehecka, Matteo Berrettini, Stefanos Tsitsipas, and Alex de Minaur to get to the final, his first ever at the Masters 1000 level.<\/p>\n
Alcaraz vs. Musetti pick<\/p>\n
Both of these players will be under heavy pressure on Sunday. This would be the biggest win of Musetti\u2019s career, while Alcaraz is looking to get back on track before next month\u2019s French Open.<\/p>\n
The moneyline odds seem fair for this tilt, but the total has some value.<\/p>\n
Musetti\u2019s game is in such a good spot, that it\u2019s hard to imagine him no-showing on Sunday. He should provide a stern test, at the very least, for Alcaraz.<\/p>\n
Throw in the fact that Alcaraz has dropped a set in two of his four matches and was taken to a tie-breaker in another, and you\u2019ve got the right ingredients for a play on the Over 20.5 games.<\/p>\n
The Pick: Over 20.5 games (BetMGM)<\/p>\n
21+. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. AZ, CO, DC, IA, IL, IN, LA, KS, KY, MA, MD, MI, NC, NJ, OH, PA, TN, VA, WV, WY. Call 877-8-HOPENY or text HOPENY (467369) (NY). Call 1-800-327-5050 (MA). Please Gamble Responsibly. Call 1-800-NEXT-STEP (AZ), 1-800-522-4700 (KS, NV), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA). Participant must complete the Wagering. Bonus Bets Expire in 7 Days. US Promotional Offers Not Available in MS, NY, ON, or PR. Visit BetMGM.com for Terms & Conditions.<\/p>\n
Why Trust New York Post Betting<\/p>\n
Michael Leboff is a long-suffering Islanders fan, but a long-profiting sports bettor with 10 years of experience in the gambling industry. He loves using game theory to help punters win bracket pools, find long shots, and learn how to beat the market in mainstream and niche sports.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Gambling content 21+. The New York Post may receive an affiliate commission if you sign up through our links. Read our editorial standards for more information. A month ago, it looked like Carlos Alcaraz had the yips.\u00a0 The Spaniard had just lost to David<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":273919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-273918","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sports"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273918","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=273918"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273918\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":273920,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273918\/revisions\/273920"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/273919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=273918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=273918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=273918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}