{"id":266666,"date":"2025-04-07T12:22:57","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T12:22:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-the-epp-takes-firmer-line-on-migration-in-policy-pitch\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T12:22:58","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T12:22:58","slug":"rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-the-epp-takes-firmer-line-on-migration-in-policy-pitch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-the-epp-takes-firmer-line-on-migration-in-policy-pitch\/","title":{"rendered":"rewrite this title in Arabic The EPP takes firmer line on migration in policy pitch"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic ADVERTISEMENTMigrant return hubs, a stronger role for Frontex and toughening the criteria for migrants to be joined by their families are among stances touted by a new position paper on migration adopted by the European People\u2019s Party (EPP) group this week, which would align the party with its more right-wing counterparts in the Parliament. this week moving,\u00a0pushing its stance on the topic further to the right.Under the title\u00a0\u201cHarnessing Migration: A Firm, Fair, and Future-Oriented Approach&#8221; the document, described as a 9-point action plan &#8220;to halt uncontrolled migration\u201d seen by Euronews is meant to define to define the group&#8217;s stance on issues like external dimension and\u00a0such as returns, fighting migrant smuggling and protection of external borders as well as the Schengen area,\u00a0EPP German MEP Lena D\u00fcpont\u00a0told Euronews.\u00a0Among controversial measures it presents several potential steps for the EU to reduce irregular migratory flows, including some controversial ones.For example, the EPP wants to use\u00a0includes a pitch for the use of\u00a0European funds to finance \u201cphysical infrastructure\u201d at the EU\u2019s external borders, breaking a long-standing taboo.\u00a0The European Commission appears to be on board: \u00a0In January Commissioner for Home Affairs Magnus Brunner left\u00a0the door open to the use of EU money to finance barriers during a debate in the European Parliament.The document says that\u00a0fresh financial resources from the EU budget are needed to meet all needs in the area of border protection, as the EU should \u201cshift the paradigm forward, from border security to border defence.\u201dThe EPP is in favour of boosting the capacity of Frontex, converting it into a \u201cfully operational European border agency equipped with state-of-the-art, advanced surveillance technologies such as drones, AI, and biometric systems.\u201dFrontex agents should also be deployed in African countries such as Senegal and Mauritania to prevent illegal migrants leaving, a possibility currently under discussion. Under discussion in what context?The paper touts partnerships with third countries as very important\u00a0means of stemming\u00a0for the EPP to tackle irregular migration by encouraging them to prevent departures and implement effective means of readmitting nationals. Those who do not cooperate with the EU should not receive European funds or visas, the paper states.Another controversial aspect concerns the Schengen Area. Several member states have temporarily reintroduced checks at their borders with other EU countries to deter so-called \u201csecondary movements\u201d of migrants, an idea also floated by incoming German Chancellor Friedrich Merz.While the suspension of Schengen\u00a0is generally criticized by the Commission, the EPP paper \u201crecognises the right of member states to reintroduce temporary internal border controls as a last-resort measure, applied exceptionally.\u201d The largest group in the Parliament now also strongly endorses a \u201ctemporary derogation from the right to asylum when migrants are instrumentalized as weapons against the EU\u201d,\u00a0something\u00a0that has already been done\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0prominent EPP member, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk.The right to asylum is enshrined in EU law and in the 1951 Geneva Refugee Convention, which was originally adopted to protect European refugees displaced by World War II.\u201cThe EU must initiate a dialogue on adapting the Geneva Convention to the current world,\u201d in order to address \u201cthe legitimate concerns of member states regarding security and migration management,\u201d according to the document.\u00a0Other ideas contained in the position paper include a crackdown on family reunification of refugees, which \u201cshould require demonstrated integration and financial stability prior to its authorization\u201d, and the revision of the European Prosecutor\u2019s mandate to include investigations into migrant smuggling.ADVERTISEMENTFinally, the EPP\u2019s position paper considers the Italy-Albania protocol adopted to process overseas asylum requests addressed to Italian authorities as \u201ca first but decisive innovative step to dissuade illegal migration\u201d aligning on this with the views of the European Conservatives and Reformists and Patriots for Europe, the two main right-wing groups in the Parliament.MEP D\u00fcpont\u00a0describes this document as part of a &#8220;push\u00a0for a firm and fair asylum and migration policy that covers the most aspects possible&#8221;, she told Euronews. &#8220;We will reach out and work with the other groups on the basis of that spirit&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic ADVERTISEMENTMigrant return hubs, a stronger role for Frontex and toughening the criteria for migrants to be joined by their families are among stances touted by a new position paper on migration adopted by the European People\u2019s Party (EPP) group this week, which would align<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":266667,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-266666","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=266666"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266666\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":266668,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/266666\/revisions\/266668"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/266667"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=266666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=266666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=266666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}