Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic
\n With some clear exceptions, there appears to be broad support among European governments to open negotiations on a 2040 emissions reduction target as soon as possible \u2013 but enthusiasm for the 90% cut favoured by the European Commission was less in evidence at an EU Council summit on Thursday.
\n ADVERTISEMENTSeveral EU governments have demanded the European Commission table an overdue proposal for a 2040 emissions reduction target, the missing milestone on the bloc\u2019s pathway to climate-neutrality by mid-century, though a few remain sceptical.Under a law adopted in 2021, the EU is committed to net-zero by 2050, after bringing its carbon emissions to 55% below 1990 levels by the end of this decade. The missing element is a 2040 target, which the EU executive was supposed to table last year, and recently removed from its provisional agenda for the coming weeks.On the way into an EU Council summit in Brussels on Thursday, French environment minister Agn\u00e8s Pannier-Runacher said she was unconcerned about the delay.\u201cI have the ambition, and I’ll say it again, that we should set the goal before Belem,\u201d Pannier-Runacher said in reference to the COP30 climate summit scheduled to take place in Brazil in November. \u201cBut this objective must be solid and based on trajectories that are achievable.\u201dThe French minister was speaking after taking part in a breakfast discussion among 19 pro \u2018green growth\u2019 governments, hosted by Portugal and attended by the EU\u2019s climate and environment commissioners Wopke Hoekstra and Jessika Roswall.Hungary seeks vetoHungary remained sceptical, however, with minister Anik\u00f3 Raisz restating its long-standing position that the decision was of such import that it could only be made by the unanimous agreement of EU heads of government \u2013 meaning the country\u2019s premier Viktor Orb\u00e1n could wield a veto.The target as envisaged under the EU\u2019s climate law would be subject to the usual legislative process, where support from a qualified majority of governments \u2013 and the European Parliament \u2013 would be sufficient.Also at the Portuguese breakfast was Germany\u2019s Steffi Lemke, who while acknowledging a swing to the right in recent elections meant this was likely to be her last EU Council summit, said she saw no room for backtracking on climate action.\u201cThose who hesitate and those who want a rollback \u2013 incidentally, for reasons completely different from market stabilisation or security interests, who simply want to return to the old fossil world \u2013 must not be allowed to have a say, especially in this situation,\u201d Lemke said.During the summit, European Commission Vice-President Teresa Ribera opened a discussion on the climate target and the recently proposed Clean Industrial Deal, a plan to boost European manufacturing and competitiveness in tandem with furthering the energy transition and industrial decarbonisation.Mixed signals over level of ambition\u201cThe Clean Industrial Deal offers certainty and predictability to investors and combines the different tools and conditions that can create a holistic approach on how to facilitate the way forward. to meet our climate targets, both what has been agreed by 2030 but also the target that we need to put forward for 2040,\u201d Ribera said \u2013 without indicating when the proposal would be tabled.Several countries \u2013 among them Czechia and Slovakia \u2013 shared Hungary\u2019s doubts about the target, especially the 90% cut recommended as a minimum by the EU\u2019s independent climate advisory board and to which the executive recommitted in its Clean Industrial Deal communication.Spain \u2013 in whose socialist government Ribera was a minister before moving to the Commission in December \u2013 supported the 90% goal and demanded a legislative bill \u201cas soon as possible\u201d, a position echoed by Finland.France reiterated its support for a target, but without explicitly backing the 90% goal. \u201cThe 2040 objective has to be based on realistic measures for all sectors, in particular for European industry,\u201d Pannier-Runacher said during the public debate.The Netherlands also wanted a \u201cswift and realistic\u201d proposal, while Germany \u2013 again without putting a number on it \u2013 said the 2040 target should be linked directly to a new one for deploying renewable energy.ADVERTISEMENTItaly did not mention the 2040 target, but described the Commission\u2019s \u201csimplification\u201d drive to ease regulation on businesses as being of \u201cdecisive importance\u201d and that it should \u201cspeed up these efforts\u201d if it wants to boost competitiveness.The ‘ball is in the Commission’s court’Whether or not they agree on a 90% target, there was a general push for the Commission to get the proposal onto the table so the EU Council and Parliament can get to work on it. Poland chaired the summit as holder of the rotating EU Council presidency.Environment minister Paulina Hennig-Kloska told reporters at the end of the summit that there was no unanimity, but ministers had \u201cmanaged to agree as far as the general directions are concerned\u201d.The ball was now in the Commission\u2019s court, the Polish minister said. Environment commissioner Roswall recalled that the EU executive remained committed to following the advice of the EU\u2019s scientific panel.ADVERTISEMENT\u201cThe 90% emission reduction target for 2040 is in the political guidelines that we have decided on, and we plan to stay the course,\u201d she said. But as to when the proposal will be tabled, all Roswall said was that it was \u201ccoming in the near future\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic With some clear exceptions, there appears to be broad support among European governments to open negotiations on a 2040 emissions reduction target as soon as possible \u2013 but enthusiasm for the 90% cut favoured by the European Commission was less in evidence at an<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":256927,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-256926","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256926"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256926\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":256928,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256926\/revisions\/256928"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/256927"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}