{"id":253321,"date":"2025-03-26T07:05:04","date_gmt":"2025-03-26T07:05:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-trump-downplays-signal-security-breach-as-a-minor-glitch\/"},"modified":"2025-03-26T07:05:05","modified_gmt":"2025-03-26T07:05:05","slug":"rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-trump-downplays-signal-security-breach-as-a-minor-glitch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-trump-downplays-signal-security-breach-as-a-minor-glitch\/","title":{"rendered":"rewrite this title in Arabic Trump downplays Signal security breach as a minor &#8216;glitch&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic<br \/>\n        Trump told local media that the lapse \u201cturned out not to be a serious one,\u201d and expressed his continued support for national security adviser Mike Waltz.<br \/>\n    ADVERTISEMENTUS President Donald Trump on Tuesday downplayed the texting of sensitive plans for a military strike against Yemen\u2019s Houthis this month to a group chat that included a journalist, calling it \u201cthe only glitch in two months\u201d of his administration.Trump&#8217;s reaction to the development, which seemed to have caught him by surprise when a reporter first asked him on Monday, comes as Democratic lawmakers heaped criticism on his administration for handling highly sensitive information carelessly.Trump told local media that the lapse \u201cturned out not to be a serious one,\u201d and expressed his continued support for national security adviser Mike Waltz.\u201cMichael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he\u2019s a good man,\u201d he said. He also appeared to place blame on an unnamed Waltz aide for Goldberg being added to the chain. \u201cIt was one of Michael\u2019s people on the phone. A staffer had his number on there.\u201dAccording to a story published online by The Atlantic on Monday, Waltz seemed to have unintentionally included Jeffrey Goldberg, the magazine&#8217;s editor-in-chief, in a chat that involved eighteen high administration officials talking about strike preparations against Houthi rebels.The use of the messaging app Signal to discuss a sensitive operation has opened the administration to blistering criticism from Democratic lawmakers who expressed outrage at the White House\u2019s and senior administration officials\u2019 insistence that no classified information was shared. Senior US administration officials have struggled to explain why the publicly available app was used to discuss such a delicate matter.Earlier on Tuesday, Waltz said he was not sure how Goldberg ended up on the chat. \u201cThis one in particular, I\u2019ve never met, don\u2019t know, never communicated with,\u201d Waltz said.Later, in an interview with FOX News, the national security adviser admitted the mistake and took responsibility.\u201cWe made a mistake. We\u2019re moving forward,\u201d said Waltz, who added that he took \u201cfull responsibility\u201d for the episode.Before defeating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election, Trump called for the former secretary of state to be charged with a crime for discussing confidential material with her advisers using a private email server she set up. The matter was investigated, but the FBI ultimately recommended against charges. None were brought.On Monday, Clinton was among Democrats this week to criticise Trump&#8217;s administration officials\u2019 use of Signal.\u201cYou have got to be kidding me,\u201d she wrote in a post on X that spotlighted The Atlantic article, making sure to include a rolling eyes emoji.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Trump told local media that the lapse \u201cturned out not to be a serious one,\u201d and expressed his continued support for national security adviser Mike Waltz. ADVERTISEMENTUS President Donald Trump on Tuesday downplayed the texting of sensitive plans for a military strike against Yemen\u2019s<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":253322,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-253321","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253321","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253321"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253321\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":253323,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253321\/revisions\/253323"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/253322"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253321"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253321"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253321"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}