{"id":234626,"date":"2025-03-09T21:40:34","date_gmt":"2025-03-09T21:40:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/tech\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-ai-frenzy-leads-us-venture-capital-to-biggest-splurge-in-three-years\/"},"modified":"2025-03-09T21:40:34","modified_gmt":"2025-03-09T21:40:34","slug":"rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-ai-frenzy-leads-us-venture-capital-to-biggest-splurge-in-three-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/tech\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-ai-frenzy-leads-us-venture-capital-to-biggest-splurge-in-three-years\/","title":{"rendered":"rewrite this title in Arabic AI frenzy leads US venture capital to biggest splurge in three years"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic US start-ups are raising more cash than at any point since 2021 thanks to investor bullishness about artificial intelligence, but the venture capital market has tilted sharply towards funding a handful of huge private tech companies.More than $30bn has been invested into fledgling groups already this quarter, according to PitchBook data. A further $50bn of fundraising is also in train, as venture capitalists work on a series of major deals involving OpenAI, Safe Superintelligence and defence tech start-up Anduril. The fervour over AI has led investors to spend at their fastest rate since the market\u2019s peak in 2021, a period in which $358bn flooded into tech groups, saddling many with unrealistic valuations.But VC groups believe this investment cycle will be different. \u201cAI is a transformative force that makes these companies better,\u201d said Hemant Taneja, chief executive of General Catalyst, one of Silicon Valley\u2019s largest venture firms. \u201cThe way to think about it is \u2018can these businesses reasonably grow 10x from where they are?\u2019 The answer with all of these is yes, so they are reasonably priced,\u201d he added. After a two-year slump, US fundraising leapt to about $80bn in the last quarter of 2024, according to data from PitchBook. That represented the best fourth quarter since 2021. But just six large deals \u2014 involving OpenAI, xAI, Databricks and others \u2014 accounted for 40 per cent of that total, said Kyle Stanford, director of research at PitchBook\u201cIt&#8217;s a very elite group of companies that are commanding the VC investment,\u201d he added.On the basis of deals already closed and those expected to do so in the coming weeks, the first quarter of this year is set to see similar levels of investment \u2014 which would make it the best first quarter for fundraising since 2022. In the past two weeks alone, fintech companies Stripe and Ramp have announced funding rounds at valuations of $91.5bn and $13bn, respectively, and AI start-ups Anthropic and Shield AI have inked deals at $61.5bn and $5.3bn, respectively. VCs are also working on a series of massive investments. OpenAI is in talks with SoftBank to raise $40bn at a $260bn valuation, which would be the largest funding round ever, surpassing the $10bn investment into Databricks late last year. Anduril, founded by Palmer Luckey, is in discussions to raise at least $2bn at a $30bn-plus valuation, more than doubling the valuation it achieved in a funding round last summer, according to two people with knowledge of the matter. Anduril declined to comment. These more established companies have annual revenues in the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars and are growing fast. That makes them relatively safe bets, according to General Catalyst\u2019s Taneja, who has backed Anduril, Anthropic, Ramp and Stripe.\u201cIt\u2019s so ambiguous where money will be made in AI, that lots of capital ends up concentrating into those companies that are category leaders with a customer base and large markets,\u201d he said.But the excitement over AI has also boosted younger companies with no revenues and, in some cases, no product.\u00a0Safe Superintelligence, launched last year by Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and former chief scientist at OpenAI, raised $1bn at a $5bn valuation in 2024 and is in talks to raise new capital at a valuation of $30bn or more, according to two people with direct knowledge of the deal.\u00a0It has not yet announced a product. SSI declined to comment. The huge funding rounds being carried out mark a significant departure from traditional venture capitalism, which targets nascent companies and is governed by the \u201cpower law\u201d that states the best start-up in a portfolio will more than pay off the losses from the remainder that fail. \u201cWe\u2019ve always thought [a venture fund\u2019s] 50x return will come from a seed investment which they exit at IPO,\u201d said PitchBook\u2019s Stanford. In a largely untested experiment, that logic is now being applied to companies that are orders of magnitude larger and more developed by a new breed of what Stanford calls \u201cpseudo-VCs\u201d. Those include Josh Kushner\u2019s Thrive Capital, General Catalyst and Lightspeed Venture Partners, all of which have invested in more than one of the large rounds in recent weeks. All three firms are registered investment advisers, allowing them to invest in a wider range of asset classes and to hold companies after they go public.Each of the three groups have also raised $5bn-plus funds, giving them \u201cscale enough to invest in start-ups at a $1bn valuation and hold on for 15 years until its worth $50bn, investing in multiple ways along the way\u201d, said Stanford.According to Sebastian Mallaby, author of The Power Law, the conviction that even the priciest start-ups can still scale by 10 times is what \u201cenables fund managers to rush in with high enthusiasm to marquee names and say \u2018who cares what I\u2019m paying? I\u2019m a genius getting into this name.\u2019\u201dWhile the chances of an established company failing are slimmer, Mallaby cautioned, so too are the odds its valuation will increase ten- or a hundred-fold. \u201cThe habits that worked really well in early-stage investing need to be adapted when you move to much bigger rounds.\u201dThe large funding rounds in discussion today represented \u201ca completely different style of venture than I\u2019ve ever experienced\u201d, said Stanford. VC\u2019s peak in 2021 was characterised by a rising tide of round sizes and valuations: there were about 854 deals of $100mn or larger that year, according to PitchBook. This year, total investment is tracking close to 2021 levels, but the market has become increasingly lopsided. \u201cIf you\u2019re OpenAI or Anduril \u2014 a high-growth, named brand \u2014 you are very well positioned. The money is there for you\u2009.\u2009.\u2009. If you\u2019re on the other side, as most companies are, the money is not there,\u201d said Stanford. \u201cMaybe it ends up at $80bn [raised this quarter], but $40bn of that is just one round\u2009.\u2009.\u2009. even the outliers in 2021 were minuscule compared to that.\u201dAdditional reporting by Cristina Criddle in San Francisco<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic US start-ups are raising more cash than at any point since 2021 thanks to investor bullishness about artificial intelligence, but the venture capital market has tilted sharply towards funding a handful of huge private tech companies.More than $30bn has been invested into fledgling groups<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-234626","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-tech"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234626"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234626\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}