{"id":222491,"date":"2025-02-26T19:03:12","date_gmt":"2025-02-26T19:03:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-argentinas-milei-sparks-row-after-appointing-supreme-court-judges-by-decree\/"},"modified":"2025-02-26T19:03:12","modified_gmt":"2025-02-26T19:03:12","slug":"rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-argentinas-milei-sparks-row-after-appointing-supreme-court-judges-by-decree","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-argentinas-milei-sparks-row-after-appointing-supreme-court-judges-by-decree\/","title":{"rendered":"rewrite this title in Arabic Argentina\u2019s Milei sparks row after appointing Supreme Court judges by decree"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic<br \/>\n        Critics see the move as an overreach of executive power and an attempt to fill the judiciary with loyalists.<br \/>\n    ADVERTISEMENTArgentina\u2019s President Javier Milei appointed two Supreme Court judges by decree on Tuesday, bypassing the Senate during its recess \u2014 a move widely condemned as an abuse of executive authority.Milei\u2019s office defended the appointments, arguing that filling the two vacancies on the five-member panel was essential for the court to function properly.\u00a0The Supreme Court &#8220;cannot carry out its normal role with only three justices,&#8221; the government said in a statement.Milei had nominated Ariel Lijo, a federal judge, and lawyer Manuel Garc\u00eda-Mansilla last year but struggled to gain Senate approval, as his libertarian coalition holds only seven of the chamber\u2019s 72 seats. The Senate also did not formally reject the candidates.\u00a0On Tuesday, the presidential office stated that \u201cthe Senate chose to remain silent,\u201d despite the fact that \u201cthe suitability of the candidates for the position was demonstrated.\u201d\u00a0Controversy over Lijo&#8217;s nominationThe appointment of Lijo, in particular, has sparked backlash. The federal judge has faced allegations of conspiracy, money laundering and illicit enrichment, as well as multiple ethics violations.His nomination surprised Milei\u2019s supporters, given that the president campaigned as an anti-establishment outsider vowing to dismantle Argentina\u2019s political elite.Human Rights Watch NGO condemned the move as &#8220;one of the most serious attacks against the independence of the Supreme Court in Argentina since the return of democracy.&#8221;\u201cPresident Milei cannot pretend to evade institutional mechanisms simply because he has not obtained the necessary votes in the Senate to appoint his candidates,\u201d said Juanita Goebertus, Americas director at the New York-based rights organisation.The appointments, issued just days before Congress returns from recess, are temporary, with Lijo and Garc\u00eda-Mansilla set to serve until 30 November, when their nominations must go before the Senate.Despite this, critics argue Milei\u2019s move is an attempt to fill the judiciary with loyalists. Legal experts warn that a president\u2019s power to appoint judges during a congressional recess is limited.&#8221;The decrees are for restrictive use and cannot be used as a mere alternative to the regular procedures provided for by the constitution,&#8221; said constitutional lawyer Andr\u00e9s Gil Dom\u00ednguez.He added that when such decrees are applied beyond their intended scope, \u201cthe constitutional order and the rights of the people are in serious danger.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Critics see the move as an overreach of executive power and an attempt to fill the judiciary with loyalists. ADVERTISEMENTArgentina\u2019s President Javier Milei appointed two Supreme Court judges by decree on Tuesday, bypassing the Senate during its recess \u2014 a move widely condemned as<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":222492,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-222491","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=222491"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222491\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":222493,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/222491\/revisions\/222493"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/222492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=222491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=222491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=222491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}