Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Sir Keir Starmer is seeking to strengthen diplomatic ties with Donald Trump\u2019s administration by shifting the UK\u2019s focus on artificial intelligence towards security co-operation rather than a \u201cwoke\u201d emphasis on safety concerns.Tech secretary Peter Kyle announced on Friday that the UK\u2019s AI Safety Institute, established just 15 months ago, would be renamed the AI Security Institute. The body, which was given a \u00a350mn budget, will no longer focus on risks associated with bias and freedom of speech, but on \u201cadvancing our understanding of the most serious risks posed by the technology\u201d.Earlier this week, the UK joined the US at the AI Summit in Paris in refusing to sign a joint communique \u2014 approved by around 60 states, including France, Germany, India and China \u2014 that pledged to ensure \u201cAI is open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure and trustworthy\u201d.Officials said the recent moves on AI were part of a broader strategy at a time the Trump administration engages in a trade war against China and the EU. Some believe aligning on US priorities over AI could help the UK avoid being targeted in other areas. At the AI summit in Paris this week, US vice-president JD Vance warned against \u201cexcessive\u201d AI regulation and said the country would build systems \u201cfree from ideological bias\u201d. Meanwhile, Trump confidant Elon Musk said at an event in Dubai on Thursday he was concerned that \u201cif, hypothetically, AI is designed to think DEI at all costs, it could think too many men are in power and just execute them\u201d.The UK\u2019s new ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson said his \u201csignature policy\u201d would be fostering collaboration between the two countries\u2019 tech sectors, to ensure both countries could secure a \u201clogical advantage\u201d over China.\u201cIt would be disastrous if we in the west lost the advanced technology race to China and China were to gain a technological stranglehold,\u201d said Mandelson, adding that the \u201cbackbone\u201d of the special relationship between the US and UK lies in its defence, intelligence and security partnerships.Britain\u2019s decision to move closer to the US on AI has been criticised by tech experts and civil society groups who argue the UK is overestimating what it has to offer, while isolating itself from European allies on tech regulation.\u201cThe US is engaged in AI imperialism,\u201d said Herman Narula, chief executive of UK-based AI company Improbable. \u201cThe thing that is of greatest interest to them is access to our market. What else do they need us for?\u201dFor the UK to present an attractive proposition to the US it will need to make serious concessions on what it can offer, including laxer rules around the inputs used to train AI models and a less stringent approach to GDPR, said Narula.At the AI summit, people briefed on the US decision not to sign the joint communique said it did not make a clear enough distinction between use of the technology by democratic and authoritarian regimes \u2014 and pointed to the fact that China was a signatory.One Labour MP described the UK\u2019s decision not to sign the declaration as a \u201clow-cost way to send a clear geopolitical signal\u201d, adding that they believed it was \u201cexactly the right move\u201d.People close to the UK\u2019s decision argued the move had been over-interpreted, arguing that it was more the result of limited efforts the French hosts of the summit made to secure signatories.The UK government said the declaration \u201cdidn\u2019t provide enough practical clarity on global governance, nor sufficiently address harder questions around national security and the challenge AI poses to it \u2014 a critical focus for the UK\u201d.When the AI Safety Institute was first launched last year, then prime minister Rishi Sunak said it would explore \u201call the risks, from social harms like bias and misinformation, to the most unlikely but extreme risk, such as humanity losing control of AI completely\u201d.\u00a0Since then, Starmer has so far held off publishing its AI Safety Bill pending greater clarity from the US government of its priorities, according to people briefed on the matter. The law would theoretically turn voluntary agreements on pre-market testing of models by the AISI with companies including Meta, Amazon and OpenAI, into legally binding obligations.Gregory C. Allen, director of the Wadhwani AI Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said that \u201csafety is associated with censorship on social media platforms because it was the safety teams of some of these platforms that were responsible for the decision to remove Donald Trump from major platforms\u201d.\u00a0Allen said he would not be surprised if the US changed the name of its own AISI in the near future. The body has so far struggled to hire staff amid a backdrop of profound political uncertainty. Last week, it emerged that the institute\u2019s inaugural director, Elizabeth Kelly, was standing down from her role.\u00a0Jakob M\u00f6kander, director of science and tech policy at the Tony Blair Institute, said the UK\u2019s AISI was the \u201cbest funded in the world\u201d, so if the US continued to collaborate with the UK it could continue to \u201chave an AI Safety Institute but send all of its models to the UK for testing\u201d.Lord Peter Ricketts, former UK national security adviser and permanent secretary at the Foreign Office, expressed scepticism that pursuing collaboration on AI would be a fruitful strand of diplomacy.\u00a0\u201cThe US AI ecosystem is so vast that any UK contribution could only make a marginal contribution and part of that would be our convening power,\u201d he said. \u201cIf we align with the US and put ourselves at odds with the EU that will surely weaken our ability to convene \u2014 and possibly damage the reset [with the EU].\u201dAdditional reporting by Chloe Cornish in Dubai<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Sir Keir Starmer is seeking to strengthen diplomatic ties with Donald Trump\u2019s administration by shifting the UK\u2019s focus on artificial intelligence towards security co-operation rather than a \u201cwoke\u201d emphasis on safety concerns.Tech secretary Peter Kyle announced on Friday that the UK\u2019s AI Safety Institute,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-206834","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-tech"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206834"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206834\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}