{"id":185863,"date":"2025-01-30T00:11:39","date_gmt":"2025-01-30T00:11:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-hundreds-protests-in-germany-against-stricter-migration-policy-backed-by-far-right\/"},"modified":"2025-01-30T00:11:40","modified_gmt":"2025-01-30T00:11:40","slug":"rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-hundreds-protests-in-germany-against-stricter-migration-policy-backed-by-far-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/politics\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-hundreds-protests-in-germany-against-stricter-migration-policy-backed-by-far-right\/","title":{"rendered":"rewrite this title in Arabic Hundreds protests in Germany against stricter migration policy backed by far-right"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic<br \/>\n        Amnesty International, Seebr\u00fccke and other organisations called for the rally under the slogan &#8220;Firewall instead of arson&#8221;.<br \/>\n    ADVERTISEMENTHundreds of people have attended a rally in front of the centre-right CDU party&#8217;s headquarters in Berlin in protest against the passing of a stricter migration policy which would seek to turn back many more migrants at Germany&#8217;s borders.The new policy was put forward by the CDU leader&#8217;s Friedrich Merz and has drawn criticism as it was only able to pass with the backing of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party.Merz has put migration in the spotlight following a knife attack a week ago by a rejected Afghan asylum-seeker who killed a man and a 2-year-old boy. The opposition leader presented two non-binding motions in parliament calling for heightened security measures and the closure of German land borders to irregular migration.The motion favouring more rejections of asylum seekers on Germany&#8217;s borders passed by 348 votes to 345, with 10 abstentions, after a combination of opposition parties, including AfD, said they would back it. Far-right lawmakers applauded the result, while the parliamentary leader of Scholz&#8217;s party, Rolf M\u00fctzenich, said Merz&#8217;s Union bloc had \u201cbroken out of the political centre.\u201dA second CDU-CSU motion with comprehensive reform proposals for a restrictive migration policy and additional powers for the security authorities was rejected by a majority of votes. The backing of Merz&#8217;s proposals by the far-right has raised political tensions in Germany, as the CDU has previously said it intends to keep up a so-called &#8216;firewall&#8217; regarding cooperation with the AfD.&#8221;We are shocked because the fact that the CDU deliberately pushed a motion through the Bundestag with votes from the AfD is a breach of taboo. This is the start of a crumbling of the firewall that is supposed to protect us from living with fascism and authoritarianism in Germany again,&#8221; says Wiebke Judith, a spokeswoman for legal policy at ProAsyl &#8211; Germany&#8217;s biggest pro-immigration advocacy organisation. Speaking in the German Parliament before the vote, Merz defended his policy and the support it drew from the AfD, saying: &#8220;A right decision does not become wrong because the wrong people agree. It remains right. It remains right.&#8221;The vote comes just weeks before Germany heads to the polls to elect a new parliament, after Scholz&#8217;s three-party governing coalition collapsed. Polls show Merz&#8217;s mainstream centre-right Union in the lead with around 30% support, while the AfD is second with about 20%, and Scholz&#8217;s centre-left Social Democrats and their remaining coalition partners, the Greens, are further back. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Amnesty International, Seebr\u00fccke and other organisations called for the rally under the slogan &#8220;Firewall instead of arson&#8221;. ADVERTISEMENTHundreds of people have attended a rally in front of the centre-right CDU party&#8217;s headquarters in Berlin in protest against the passing of a stricter migration policy<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":185864,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-185863","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185863"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185863\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":185865,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185863\/revisions\/185865"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/185864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}