Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic
\n Trump\u2019s pick for Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth\u2019s former sister-in-law alleges abuse against second wife in an affidavit sent to the US Senate.
\n ADVERTISEMENTSenators vetting the nomination of Pete Hegseth for Defence Secretary received an affidavit on Tuesday from a former sister-in-law alleging that he was abusive to his second wife.The affidavit said the once Fox News host was abusive to the degree where his former wife feared for her safety.The sister-in-law, Danielle Hegseth, was formerly married to the nominee\u2019s brother and in an affidavit obtained by the Associated Press, says she believes Pete is \u201cunfit\u201d to run the Defence Department.The affidavit describes Hegseth\u2019s treatment of his second wife, Samantha, alleging that Trump\u2019s nominee displayed patterns of repeated drunkenness and a domestic situation.Danielle says Samantha had picked a safe word to indicate if she was ever in any danger at home, which she texted to her sometime in 2015 or 2016. Danielle says she immediately called a third-party for help upon receiving the safe word.\u201cI have chosen to come forward publicly, at significant personal sacrifice, because I am deeply concerned by what Hegseth\u2019s confirmation would mean for our military and our country,\u201d said Danielle Hegseth.An attorney for Pete Hegseth vehemently denies the allegations. Tim Parlatore says the affidavit was filled with \u201cbelated claims\u201d by an ex-relative with an \u201caxe to grind against the entire Hegseth family\u201d.\u201cSam has never alleged that there was any abuse, she signed court documents acknowledging that there was no abuse and recently reaffirmed the same during her FBI interview,\u201d Parlatore said in a statement.\u201cBelated claims by Danielle Dietrich, an anti-Trump far left Democrat who is divorced from Mr. Hegseth\u2019s brother and never got along with the Hegseth family, do nothing to change that,\u201d he added.The affidavit was filed after Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island \u2013 the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee \u2013 sought her statement to gain personal insight and assess Hegseth\u2019s fitness to occupy the important position.Hegseth\u2019s sister-in-law says she first relayed her allegation to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Concerned the information was not shared with Congress as senators considered Pete\u2019s nomination, she opted to share the allegations with them too.Danielle said in her affidavit that she believes wholeheartedly that Pete\u2019s marriage to Samantha was abusive. She explained that one time back in 2014, Samantha had shared with her that she hid in a closet fearing for her safety. She did acknowledge however that she did not personally witness any physical or sexual abuse by Pete toward his ex-wife.She also moved to label Pete\u2019s behaviour as \u201cerratic and aggressive\u201d, detailing that he\u2019s exhibited those tendencies for \u201cmany years\u201d.She also accused him in his affidavit for allegedly endorsing non-consensual sex. She says that Pete, while under the influence of alcohol as the two of them left a bar repeatedly shouted, \u201cno means yes!\u201d.\u201cI took this to mean that, in his opinion, nonconsensual sex is ok,\u201d Danielle Hegseth said in the affidavit.ADVERTISEMENTRepublican leaders say they doubt the new allegations would change the votes of support they\u2019re lining up for Hegseth. They marched ahead with the nomination on Tuesday evening, taking a key procedural step needed to confirm his appointment by the weekend.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Trump\u2019s pick for Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth\u2019s former sister-in-law alleges abuse against second wife in an affidavit sent to the US Senate. ADVERTISEMENTSenators vetting the nomination of Pete Hegseth for Defence Secretary received an affidavit on Tuesday from a former sister-in-law alleging that he<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":177039,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-177038","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177038"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177038\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":177040,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177038\/revisions\/177040"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/177039"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}