Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic
\n MEPs from the left side of the European Parliament dislike Polish Prime minister\u2019s attitude on migrations and the Green Deal, while Patriots and Conservatives say they\u00a0don\u2019t trust him
\n ADVERTISEMENTPolish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s address to the European Parliament on Wednesday garnered some warm applause for his stance on defence but criticism quickly emerged over his attack on the Green Deal and his migration track record.\u00a0Socialists and Democrats (S&D), for\u00a0instance, condemned Tusk\u2019s call\u00a0to deregulate to boost European competitiveness as well as his \u00a0migration policy, which\u00a0focuses\u00a0primarily\u00a0on border security.\u201cWe strongly oppose this regressive approach to migration, which is biased towards the security side instead of striking a fair balance between shared responsibility and solidarity with those fleeing from despair,\u201d Juan Fernando L\u00f3pez Aguilar, a prominent Spanish Socialist MEP, told Euronews after the debate.He and his colleagues criticised\u00a0Tusk\u2019s refusal to implement\u00a0the Pact on Migration and Asylum, which was adopted\u00a0by the EU in 2024 and is set to be fully implemented by mid-2026. Poland plans to introduce a time-limited and territorial suspension of the right to asylum and is among those countries that have missed\u00a0the first deadline to present their national implementation plans.\u201cSecurity means also sticking to the legislation that we have adopted,\u201d quipped L\u00f3pez Aguilar, also criticising Poland\u2019s strategy to erect walls and fences at the border with Belarus to be paid for with EU money. \u201cWe strongly oppose EU financing for fences on the external borders of the European Union. There are borders to be protected, but fairly and in good balance, not only by strengthening\u00a0external borders but also by cooperating fairly with countries of transit or origin, opening up legal pathways, and, of course, understanding the EU\u2019s commitment to fundamental rights and human rights.\u201dIrregular crossings at Poland\u2019s and Lithuania\u2019s borders by migrants\u00a0entering\u00a0from Belarus have increased\u00a0by 192% in the last year compared to 2023, but still represent a small fraction of the total irregular entries into the EU: 17,001 out of over 239,000 detections, far fewer than the irregular arrivals through the Mediterranean routes\u00a0or in the\u00a0Canary Islands.Another contentious issue in Tusk\u2019s speech was the Green Deal with some MEPs reacting negatively to his call for a “full and very critical review” of the pro-environment laws.\u201cTusk\u2019s line, which is also the European People\u2019s Party line, actually takes a step back on the Green Deal. While for us it is necessary to fight energy poverty [as Tusk claimed], at the same time it is necessary to give a greater input to the Green Deal,\u201d Italian MEP Danilo Della Valle from The Left group told Euronews.Like other colleagues, Della Valle believes that a boost in renewable energy is the best way to decrease Europe\u2019s reliance on other countries. \u201cWe always talk about energy independence, but how can we be independent from Russian gas or LNG from the US if we do not invest in renewable energies?\u201dNationalist parties have no trust in TuskSharp criticism also\u00a0came from right-wing groups including the\u00a0European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR), Patriots for Europe (PfE), and Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN), among which there are several Polish MEPs.They attacked him on domestic issues, claiming his government is backsliding on democracy and the rule of law, as well as on some of his flagship policies.\u00a0\u201cDespite pledging to strengthen the Union’s independence from Russia, his (Tusk’s) collaborators\u00a0recently approved a gas deal with Russian suppliers and removed a Gazprom-linked company from the sanctions list”\u00a0Patryk\u00a0Jaki (Poland), the co-chairman of the ECR group said, adding that confidence in Mr. Tusk\u2019s leadership by the EU institutions would be na\u00efve.Fellow Polish MEP, from the opposition nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) party, Piotr M\u00fcller, agreed with Tusk on the need to backtrack\u00a0on environmental policies, but told Euronews that this plea must translate into concrete actions\u00a0including the withdrawal from the Green Deal of the revised\u00a0Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), a mechanism that requires polluters to pay for their greenhouse gas emissions.\u00a0\u201cWe are not talking about postponing this, but withdrawing from this kind of solutions. And no such declaration was made today, there was only a general talk that it should be adjusted to the possibilities of citizens,” he said.MEP Anna Bry\u0142ka from\u00a0Poland’s extreme-right party Konfederacja also expressed her disbelief in Tusk\u2019s promises. \u201cWhen Prime Minister Tusk said that he is against massive and uncontrolled migration, that he wants to block our EU\u2019s external borders, he’s a liar,\u201d\u00a0she told Euronews.ADVERTISEMENTTwo years ago, she argued,\u00a0Tusk and his party voted against the construction of a fence at the Polish-Belarusian border. \u201cI am very happy that he changed his mind about the external European Union\u2019s borders. But he is not the right person to make things happen.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic MEPs from the left side of the European Parliament dislike Polish Prime minister\u2019s attitude on migrations and the Green Deal, while Patriots and Conservatives say they\u00a0don\u2019t trust him ADVERTISEMENTPolish Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s address to the European Parliament on Wednesday garnered some warm applause<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":176306,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-176305","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-politics"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=176305"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":176307,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/176305\/revisions\/176307"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/176306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=176305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=176305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=176305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}