{"id":159537,"date":"2025-01-09T15:01:51","date_gmt":"2025-01-09T15:01:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/tech\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-superintelligence-will-take-time-to-generate-super-returns\/"},"modified":"2025-01-09T15:01:51","modified_gmt":"2025-01-09T15:01:51","slug":"rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-superintelligence-will-take-time-to-generate-super-returns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/tech\/rewrite-this-title-in-arabic-superintelligence-will-take-time-to-generate-super-returns\/","title":{"rendered":"rewrite this title in Arabic \u2018Superintelligence\u2019 will take time to generate super returns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Stay informed with free updatesSimply sign up to the Artificial intelligence myFT Digest &#8212; delivered directly to your inbox.Any company such as OpenAI, heading for a loss of $5bn last year on $3.7bn of revenue, needs a good story to tell to keep the funding flowing. And stories don\u2019t come much more compelling than saying your company is on the cusp of transforming the world and creating a \u201cglorious future\u201d by developing artificial general intelligence.Definitions vary about what AGI means, given that it represents a theoretical rather than a technological threshold. But most AI researchers would say it is the point at which machine intelligence surpasses human intelligence across most cognitive fields. Attaining AGI is the industry\u2019s holy grail and the explicit mission of companies such as OpenAI and Google DeepMind, even though some holdouts still doubt it will ever be achieved.Most predictions of when we might reach AGI have been drawing nearer due to the striking progress in the industry. Even so, Sam Altman, OpenAI\u2019s chief executive, startled many on Monday when he posted on his blog: \u201cWe are now confident we know how to build AGI as we have traditionally understood it.\u201d The company, which triggered the latest investment frenzy in AI after launching its ChatGPT chatbot in November 2022, was valued at $150bn in October. ChatGPT now has more than 300mn weekly users.There are several reasons to be sceptical about Altman\u2019s claim that AGI is essentially a solved problem. OpenAI\u2019s most persistent critic, the AI researcher Gary Marcus, was quick off the mark. \u201cWe are now confident that we can spin bullshit at unprecedented levels, and get away with it,\u201d Marcus tweeted, parodying Altman\u2019s statement. In a separate post, Marcus repeated his assertion that \u201cthere is zero justification for claiming that the current technology has achieved general intelligence\u201d, citing its lack of reasoning power, understanding and reliability.But OpenAI\u2019s extraordinary valuation seemingly assumes that Altman may be right. In his post, he suggested that AGI should be seen more as a process towards achieving superintelligence than an end point. Still, if the threshold ever were crossed, AGI would probably count as the biggest event of the century. Even the sun god of news that is Donald Trump would be eclipsed.Investors reckon that a world in which machines become smarter than humans in most fields would generate phenomenal wealth for their creators. Used wisely, AGI could accelerate scientific discovery and help us become vastly more productive. But super-powerful AI also carries concerns: excessive concentration of corporate power and possibly existential risk.Diverting though these debates may be, they remain theoretical, and from an investment perspective unknowable. But OpenAI suggests that enormous value can still be derived from applying increasingly powerful but narrow AI systems to a widening number of real-world uses. The industry phrase of the year is agentic AI, using digital assistants to achieve specific tasks. Speaking at the CES event in Las Vegas this week, Jensen Huang, chief executive of chip designer Nvidia, defined agentic AI as systems that can \u201cperceive, reason, plan and act\u201d.\u00a0Agentic AI is certainly one of the hottest draws for venture capital. CB Insights\u2019 State of Venture 2024 report calculated that AI start-ups attracted 37 per cent of the global total of $275bn of VC funding last year, up from 21 per cent in 2023. The fastest-growing areas for investment were AI agents and customer support. \u201cWe believe that, in 2025, we may see the first AI agents \u2018join the workforce\u2019 and materially change the output of companies,\u201d Altman wrote.Take travel, for example. Once prompted by text or voice, AI agents can book entire business trips: securing the best flights, finding the most convenient hotel, scheduling diary appointments and arranging taxi pick-ups. That methodology applies to a vast array of business functions and it\u2019s a fair bet that an AI start-up somewhere is working out how to automate them.\u00a0Relying on autonomous AI agents to perform such tasks requires a user to trust the technology. The problem with hallucinations is now well known. One other concern is prompt injection, where a malicious counterparty tricks an AI agent into disclosing confidential information. To build a secure multi-agent economy at scale will require the development of trustworthy infrastructure, which may take some time.The returns from AI will also have to be spectacular to justify the colossal investments being made by the big tech companies and VC firms. How long will impatient investors hold their nerve?john.thornhill@ft.com<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Summarize this content to 2000 words in 6 paragraphs in Arabic Stay informed with free updatesSimply sign up to the Artificial intelligence myFT Digest &#8212; delivered directly to your inbox.Any company such as OpenAI, heading for a loss of $5bn last year on $3.7bn of revenue, needs a good story to tell to keep the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-159537","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-tech"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159537"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159537\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globetimeline.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}