The approval of two controversial high-rise towers in Frankston has sparked mixed reactions among the community. While some residents are disappointed by the decision, others see it as a positive development for the area. Urban DC owner Danny Ciarma believes that the tribunal ruling will enhance the range of housing options available to buyers and boost the confidence of developers and buyers. He has already received numerous calls from interested buyers following the announcement.
Opponents of the development, including members of the “Stop the Great Wall of Frankston” community campaign, have raised concerns about the potential risks posed by the towers. They argue that the buildings are too exposed to rising sea levels and inundation. However, Ciarma refutes these criticisms, stating that the project is on higher ground compared to other properties in lower-lying parts of Frankston. The tribunal also pointed out that the Frankston City Council had previously approved a similar 11-storey mixed-use development in the area, deeming the proposed towers’ amenity impacts on the adjoining residential area acceptable.
This decision comes after a series of changes to planning controls along the Nepean Highway in Frankston. In July, Planning Minister Sonya Kilkenny imposed a ban on buildings above three storeys in the area, only to reverse the decision three months later. When the ban expired in October, newly gazetted planning controls set a “preferred” 12-storey height limit on the strip. Frankston Mayor Nathan Conroy has welcomed the tribunal ruling, emphasizing the benefits it would bring to the city. Conroy believes that the development will attract more foot traffic to businesses in the central business district and provide much-needed housing diversity.
Despite the controversy surrounding the high-rise towers, some community members see them as a positive addition to Frankston’s landscape. The increased housing options and potential foot traffic generated by the development are viewed as beneficial for the local economy. Mayor Conroy estimates that close to 200 people will be drawn to the city center as a result of the Harbour development. The decision has sparked discussions about the future of urban planning in Frankston and how best to balance the needs of residents with the city’s growth and development.
Overall, the approval of the high-rise towers in Frankston has highlighted the complex interplay between development, community interests, and urban planning regulations. While some residents are disappointed by the decision and have raised concerns about the potential risks associated with the towers, others see it as a step towards enhancing housing options and boosting economic activity in the area. The tribunal ruling marks a significant moment for Frankston, sparking debates about the city’s future direction and the importance of balancing growth with community needs. As the development moves forward, it will be crucial to address the concerns of residents while harnessing the potential benefits that the high-rise towers could bring to the city.
