Actress Jenna Dewan and her ex-husband Channing Tatum are currently engaged in a legal battle over intellectual property rights. Dewan alleges that she and Tatum acquired the intellectual property together, but Tatum transferred the licensing rights to a third party without her knowledge, putting the earnings into an irrevocable trust. Tatum disputes Dewan’s claim, and the matter is currently being investigated.
Both Dewan and Tatum have included a list of witnesses in the legal proceedings, with Tatum’s list including various business partners such as directors Steven Soderbergh and Greg Jacobs, producers Nick Wechsler and Peter Kiernan, and screenwriter Reid Carolin. Dewan’s fiancé Steve Kazee is also included in Tatum’s witness list, expected to testify about their cohabitation, joint expenses, and related matters.
A trial setting conference is scheduled for April 12th, with both parties preparing for a potentially lengthy legal battle over the disputed intellectual property rights. Dewan and Tatum, who share a son together, have been involved in this legal dispute for several years now and it seems to be reaching a turning point with the upcoming trial setting conference.
The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for both Dewan and Tatum, as well as their business partners. The dispute over intellectual property rights and licensing agreements is a complex issue that will require careful examination of all the evidence presented by both parties in court.
As the legal proceedings continue, Dewan and Tatum’s relationship, both personal and professional, may be further strained. The involvement of their business partners and other witnesses in the case adds another layer of complexity to an already complicated situation, with potentially far-reaching consequences for all involved.
Ultimately, the resolution of this legal battle will depend on the evidence presented in court and the decisions made by the judge overseeing the case. Dewan and Tatum will need to present a strong case to support their claims, and it remains to be seen how this dispute over intellectual property rights will be resolved.
