The media treatment of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg leading up to the recent verdict in the New York hush money case involving former President Donald Trump has been compared to the “American version of the Kate Middleton treatment” by attorney Andrew Weissmann. Weissmann argued that Bragg was unfairly portrayed as “struggling” in his role, and that his case against Trump was strong and being handled aggressively. Despite initial negative judgments, Weissmann believed Bragg demonstrated the necessary qualities for the job.
After Trump was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records by a New York jury, including in the hush money case, Weissmann praised Bragg’s work as “spectacular and methodical.” There was skepticism leading up to the verdict about whether the case against Trump, considered the weakest of the four criminal counts he faced, would lead to a conviction. However, the jury unanimously found Trump guilty on all counts, making him the first former president to be criminally convicted. Bragg, humble in his victory, stated that he simply did his job by following the facts and the law.
Some social media users agreed with Weissmann’s assessment that Bragg had been underestimated and vilified by the media, suggesting that he deserved an apology and respect. However, some criticized Weissmann for comparing Bragg’s treatment to that of Kate Middleton, as Middleton is typically treated with more deference by the media. Middleton recently revealed she was undergoing chemotherapy after being diagnosed with cancer, following rampant rumors about her health and personal life.
Despite the challenges and criticisms Bragg faced, he remained focused on the facts and the law throughout the case against Trump. Bragg emphasized that the trial and verdict were approached in the same manner as any other case, even though the defendant, Trump, was unlike any other in American history. His response to the victory reflected his dedication to his role as district attorney and commitment to upholding the law.
Overall, the comparison of Alvin Bragg’s media treatment to that of Kate Middleton highlighted the scrutiny and challenges faced by public figures in high-profile cases. While Middleton faced unfounded rumors and had to disclose her cancer diagnosis publicly, Bragg worked diligently to bring a high-profile criminal case to a successful conclusion. The comparison serves as a reminder of the complexities and pressures faced by those in the public eye, and the importance of remaining focused on the job at hand despite external distractions.
